0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓ»ó°£È£»çÀÇ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£ ½Çõ ¿µÇâ¿äÀÎ: °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£¹ý Áö½Ä, ¿ËÈ£°£È£¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î

Factors Influencing Clinical Nurses' Practice of Personal Information Protection: Focusing on Knowledge of Personal Information Protection Law and Nursing Patient Advocacy

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2023³â 29±Ç 3È£ p.261 ~ 270
KMID : 1004620230290030261
±èµ¿Àº ( Kim Dong-Eun ) - 

¹Ú¿ÏÁÖ ( Park Wan-Ju ) - 

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÓ»ó°£È£»çÀÇ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£¹ý Áö½Ä, ¿ËÈ£°£È£°¡ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£ ½Çõ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ¿© ÀÓ»ó°£È£»çÀÇ È¯ÀÚ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£ ½Çõµµ¸¦ ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊÀڷḦ Á¦°øÇÏ°íÀÚ ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù.

¹æ¹ý: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ´ë»óÀÚ´Â »ó±ÞÁ¾ÇÕº´¿ø°ú Á¾ÇÕº´¿øÀÇ º´µ¿¿¡¼­ 6°³¿ù ÀÌ»ó ±Ù¹«ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â 140¸íÀÇ ÀÓ»ó°£È£»ç¸¦ ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2023³â 2¿ù 20ÀϺÎÅÍ 3¿ù 3ÀϱîÁö ¼³¹®À» ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÃÖÁ¾ÀûÀ¸·Î 130ºÎÀÇ ¼³¹®Áö°¡ ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù.

°á°ú: º» ¿¬±¸ °á°ú¿¡¼­ ÀÓ»ó°£È£»çÀÇ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£ ½Çõ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀº ¿ËÈ£°£È£ÀÇ ÇÏÀ§¿µ¿ªÀÎ ¿ËÈ£Àڷμ­ÀÇ Çൿ(¥â=.32, p=.004), ȯ°æ°ú ±³À°ÀÇ ¿µÇâ(¥â=.21, p=.040), °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£¹ý Áö½Ä(¥â=.19, p=.013), 5³â ÀÌ»ó 10³â ¹Ì¸¸ÀÇ ÃÑ ÀÓ»ó°æ·Â(¥â=.17, p=.036)À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º» ȸ±Í¸ðÇüÀÇ ¼³¸í·Â °ªÀº 34.0%·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù.

°á·Ð: ¿ËÈ£°£È£ÀÇ ÇÏÀ§¿µ¿ª Áß ¿ËÈ£Àڷμ­ÀÇ ÇൿÀº °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£ ½Çõ¿¡ °¡Àå ³ôÀº ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÓ»ó°£È£»çÀÇ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£ ½ÇõÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇØ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±³À°°ú ¿ËÈ£°£È£¸¦ Àå·ÁÇÔÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the influence of knowledge of personal information protection law andnursing patient advocacy on practice of personal information protection among nurses.

Methods: The subjectswere 130 nurses who have worked for six months or more in the ward of the tertiary or general hospitals. Datawere collected from February 20 to March 3, 2023.

Results: Factors influencing practice of personalinformation protection were acting as an advocate (¥â=.32, p=.004), environmental and educationalinfluences (¥â=.21, p=.040), knowledge of personal information protection law (¥â=.19, p=.013) and clinicalexperience for five years or more but less than ten years (¥â=.17, p=.036). The regression model showed anexplanatory power of 34.0%.

Conclusion: Acting as an advocate has the most effect on practice of personalinformation protection. To promote practice of personal information protection for nurses, it is necessary toprovide education related to privacy protection and encourage nursing patient advocacy.
KeyWords
½Çõ, Áö½Ä, °£È£, ´ë»óÀÚ ¿ËÈ£
Behavior, Knowledge, Nursing, Patient Advocacy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸